A Series of Negatives on Inherent Unfairness, Part IV

The story of Creation and the Garden of Eden is well-travelled ground for the Christians (and some non-Christians) in the Manosphere. I want to discuss an aspect of it that I have never realized before last night, and have never seen discussed–though I might have just missed it. Each part is a really short bit that isn’t talked about in scripture explicitly, but is unavoidable once you see it between the lines. By unavoidable, I do not mean that I have the answer, but that it is a question that should definitely be asked.

One of the ways in which the stories of the Bible, and the parables of Jesus, are so good is because they are the field in which new treasures are always being found.

44 “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field, which a man found and covered up. Then in his joy he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field.”

This is part IV of a series in digging for what is under the surface. I was going to do several parts, but I have some things I want to say, and I need to get through this so I can build upon it. You can find the other parts here: Part IPart II, Part III.

Before I start Genesis chapter 2, I want to point out that in Chapter 1, God never says that anything is evil, or not good. This is one of those negatives of the picture to which we should pay attention. God is not on a manic spree saying everything He does is good simply because He did it. He is working deliberately, and when the work is finished, then He assesses it. It is then that He pronounces it good.

I need to be very careful here, but it seems to me that something happened before the appearance of man; something God does not approve of (in the sense that He would proclaim it good) happens. At some point Lucifer rejects God’s authority, and becomes evil, he becomes the Devil–the Adversary, or Prosecutor; and Satan, the Deceiver. We know from the story of Job that Lucifer comes before the Lord and accuses man of sinfulness–which God allows! Regardless, God does not take the time to say, “This is not good”, or “This is evil.” In other words: He does not go around bemoaning bad things that happen, or pointing out faults (though He will later).

Which brings up a question: If God wants us to do right, and does not want us to do wrong, why does God allow the existence of Satan in the first place?

Which brings up another question: What is Satan doing while God is creating the universe, light, day, the Earth, plants, and animals?

I’ll come back to this in another post.

The first three verses of Genesis 2 are strangely placed to me, because they are clearly linked to the process of creation that is in chapter 1.

2 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done. So God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it God rested from all his work that he had done in creation.

Why does God rest? Is He tired? If so, in what sense? God “hath not a body like man”, so he can’t be physically tired. He’s also omnipotent.

I think this is the first example of God, the father and husband of mankind, condescending to man. God could just tell man to rest every so often, but He has expressed Himself so far as a god of action. His way is to be with us, not just give direction. He seldom speaks, and when He does it is to praise. When He gives direction it is a positive, and it is an exhortation to be like Him:

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.”

God has already been fruitful. He has multiplied everything. He has filled the earth, and subdued it. He has dominion over all things, and nothing He has made is forbidden Him. So, when God rests, this is him living in understanding with the weaker vessel; treating us as heirs with Him of the grace of life from the beginning of time. Where else do we see this?

Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered.

It’s not a matter of being “right”, or  “good”, or “fair” for God to rest. It is a necessity for man to rest, and because God wants to be with man, He rests with us. When we don’t rest, we are expressing multiple things:

  • We know what we need better than God.
  • We are insulting Him by working when He rests (as if we are the stronger)
  • Worst of all: We are spurning his affections.

A very common thing to see in the household of a “Good Christian Woman”–in addition to the monstrously painful sin of a wife denying her husband fleshly pleasures–is the less painful but still utterly rebellious and dysfunctional charade of industry. It often occurs when a man asks his wife to recline with him, and she insists that she doesn’t have time for him because she’s too busy cleaning the house.

Who would say cleaning the house is unimportant? To ask the question is to miss the point.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “A Series of Negatives on Inherent Unfairness, Part IV

  1. I do hope you are following Lewis’ picture of the angels as masculine/feminine in respects to the object that they are approaching (man/God respectively). It seems you are with your comments on condescension.

  2. I read those when I was about 14. I was already a Lewis fan (for fun: Narnia, for discipline Dad made me read God in the Dock, and other essay collections) but those books did not speak to me then. I had no idea what I was reading, and and made drudge work of them.

    I should go back.

  3. I have, but it has been awhile, and I remember very little (that was 15 years ago). I plan on reading it again very soon. Not because of my thinking on unfairness, but because of my thinking on Artemis, and her two forms. That was where I learned that the Artemis I knew of (huntress) was the same as the Earthmother/bear cult. When I saw 13th Warrior for the first time, I was ecstatic to see it represented onscreen.

    So it deals with unfairness, huh? That is very reassuring.

  4. Hah, you don’t remember? Well, the first book ends with:

    Now, you who read, judge between the gods and me. They gave me nothing in the world to love but Psyche and then took her from me. But that was not enough. They then brought me to her at such a place and time that it hung on my word whether she should continue in bliss or be cast out into misery. They would not tell me whether she was the bride of a god, or mad, or a brute’s or villain’s spoil. They would give no clear sign, though I begged for it. I had to guess. And because I guessed wrong they punished me – what’s worse, punished me through her. And even that was not enough; they have now sent out a lying story in which I was given no riddle to guess, but knew and saw that she was the god’s bride, and of my own will destroyed her, and that for jealousy. As if I were another Redival. I say the gods deal very unrightly with us. For they will neither (which would be best of all) go away and leave us to live our own short days to ourselves, nor will they show themselves openly and tell us what they would have us do. For that too would be endurable. But to hint and hover, to draw near to us in dreams and oracles, or in a waking vision that vanishes as soon as seen, to be dead silent when we question them and then glide back and whisper (words we cannot understand) in our ears when we most wish to be free of them, and to show one what they hide from another; what is all this but cat-and-mouse play, blindman’s bluff, and mere jugglery? Why must holy places be dark places?

  5. I recall it now. Sounds like Job.

    However; I wonder if I am getting confused on my Greek goddesses.

    Who is the ugly sister in Til We Have Faces? That’s who said the above, correct?

  6. Ungit is Artemis.

    I realize that sounds confused, because she’s Aphrodite, but I am pretty sure I am right. I read a bunch about it at the time because I didn’t know the story of Eros and Psyche, and it led into a whole bunch of other things.

    However–it’s entirely possible I’m wrong. The stories often overlap; especially once the Romans got ahold of them.

  7. In no particular order, and possibly relating to TWHF, and/or ancient earth mother goddesses of Mediterranean and Near-East regions:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_goddess
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus_(mythology)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_(mythology)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamia_(mythology) (disfigured face, among other things)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilithyia
    and of course: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leto

    I can hardly tell where one ends, and the other begins.

  8. Interested in seeing where you are going with this. I will acknowledge up front that I get rather quiet and wary whenever a writer or a preacher wonder out loud too much about what isn’t written. But I am still reading along.

    I have been meaning to read Pilgrim’s Progress for quite some time Gabs. I think I’ll make a goal to read it before year’s end.

  9. Regress, not Progress. Two different books – Regress by CSL, and Progress by John Bunyan, a 17th century Puritan. Both are worth reading.

  10. Unger is right about “Perelandra” but he touches on the same in “That Hideous Strength” with his view of Venus and Mars (who he pictures as angels) who recapture their roles there.

  11. Pingback: A Series of Negatives on Inherent Unfairness, Part V | Things that We have Heard and Known

  12. Pingback: A Series of Negatives on Inherent Unfairness, Part VI | Things that We have Heard and Known

  13. I see that you’ve shown the relationship between God with His people being used as an example for husbands with their wives. I’ve wondered how far we can take this without making husbands into a God. For example, I would never question God, but I think it’s okay to question husbands.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s