Eurovision Owns NFL at Tolerance. Film at Eleven*.

The Pink Mafia is successfully erecting their goalposts right in our faces and mushroom-stamping all of Western Civilization along the way. This past week the NFL drafted its first openly homosexual player. THWACK! Not to be outdone by wee Yankee upstarts: Europeans choose a bearded transexual as their mascot of pop music. THWACK! THWACK!

It was an ignoble effort, but (unfortunately for the Americans) their sexual deviant icon is a large black man who–if you can avoid the picture of him kissing his white bitch boyfriend–still clings to some vestigial masculinity. The European candidate for degenerate of the year is a full-blown nut bag…which is even more fitting than the American one’s overly developed fondness for balls. All hail the queen.

* For the edification of the even younger fogies than I:

Advertisements

22 thoughts on “Eurovision Owns NFL at Tolerance. Film at Eleven*.

  1. Curious why you referred to The Pink Mafia rather the The Velvet Mafia (no offense to my good friend when she reads this). And why this is tagged “feminism”. My initial thought is that feminism is indirectly linked to the gaying of America but liberalism is its parent.

  2. @Elspeth

    The Pink Mafia is what I’ve called them for a long time, and I’m sure I got that somewhere else. Awhile back there was an article in D magazine with the same reference. 1996, it turns out.

    http://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/1996/november/the-pink-mafia

    I remember seeing it at the checkout stands and saying, “Hey! That’s what I call it, too!”

    As for “why feminism”. It’s all about trashing manhood in the name of equality. Even when I was a teenager I referred to my mother’s Christianese self-help books as Pink Christianity because of their soft, sola femina approach to Christianity and life…which she hated.

  3. Pink Mafia goes back a long way and I believe specicly refers to the gay staff at the Vatican and started as a term amongst Catholics to identify them. See also Lavender Mafia.

  4. Quite an opening image… although I can’t say it isn’t accurate.

    In the end though the futility of it all is at least somewhat amusing. The queerification of our culture is more of an artifact of our abandoning marriage, and with it sexual morality. While they can probably double or triple the percentage of people who end up being gay, they won’t be able to change reality and they won’t break single digit percents. My wife was reading something the other day by a hardcore liberal who was surprised to find themselves troubled that their son had accepted the pro gay drivel they were feeding him. Once little Billy started talking about how great Steve and Bob their gay “married” friends were and how he wanted to be like them, mom and dad started to rethink their foolishness.

  5. While they can probably double or triple the percentage of people who end up being gay, they won’t be able to change reality and they won’t break single digit percents.

    I used to think that was true, but not too long ago I re-read Judges. There’s that story about the guy traveling through Benjaminite lands and all the townsmen surround the house of his host; demanding the host send the traveller out so they can screw him.

    Like the other times I’ve read it, I am dumbfounded that all the men were gay. This time I realized: You know, this means things really can get worse. Those men probably had wives and families. They don’t have to stop having heterosexual relations to start having perverted ones.

  6. This time I realized: You know, this means things really can get worse. Those men probably had wives and families. They don’t have to stop having heterosexual relations to start having perverted ones.

    I do recall reading a discussion on a manosphere site, though I can’t remember which one, about the “gaying” of heterosexual porn. I don’t watch porn and had no idea, but apparently there is, um, more subtle interaction between multiple males with a female now in porn aimed at straight men. So yes, it can and almost certainly will get significantly worse.

    The reason Dalrock is right, though, about homosexuality never breaking single digits is because when researchers investigate homosexuality, they frame it as an identity. The question usually asks people if they consider themselves to be homosexual as an identity, but some people have sexual relations with people of the same sex without embracing a queer identity, which is probably what the men in Judges were doing.

    The queerification of our culture is more of an artifact of our abandoning marriage, and with it sexual morality.

    Disagree. The queerification of our culture, the abandonment of marriage, and the embracing of sexual immorality all stem from a common source, namely liberalism. Liberalism, of course, is simply Satanic at its core as it is inherently rebellious. Fixing marriage alone doesn’t cure liberalism (though I very much support fixing marriage anyway).

  7. @Cane Caldo

    I used to think that was true, but not too long ago I re-read Judges. There’s that story about the guy traveling through Benjaminite lands and all the townsmen surround the house of his host; demanding the host send the traveller out so they can screw him.

    Like the other times I’ve read it, I am dumbfounded that all the men were gay. This time I realized: You know, this means things really can get worse. Those men probably had wives and families. They don’t have to stop having heterosexual relations to start having perverted ones.

    Interesting point. Either way, we are hell bent on finding it out. I don’t just mean the liberals pushing this in the culture, but modern Christians fretting that people might marry in their early 20s and all of the other harm which is done to marriage.

    If perversion could spread so widely across a culture with marriage as a norm (but obviously something was very wrong), we are taking a huge risk (collectively) shrugging our shoulders at the destruction of marriage. Something will fill that void, be it porn or homosexuality or pickup artistry or sexbots. This isn’t to say that an individual man is powerless to avoid these kinds of sin without a wife, but that culturally this is what will happen as we continue to turn our backs on marriage. When that something does fill the void, the hue and cry from conservatives will be outrage that something filled the void, but will they lose their enthusiasm for the void itself?

  8. @Dalrock

    Either way, we are hell bent on finding it out. I don’t just mean the liberals pushing this in the culture, but modern Christians fretting that people might marry in their early 20s and all of the other harm which is done to marriage.

    Absolutely. What occurred to me is the same thing that SMM echoed. I always assumed the men in that tale from Judges identified as gay. They probably didn’t. It was more like a prison situation than a Greenwich Village one. Greenwich Village won’t get above 10% because by definition there just aren’t that many rich people. Prison-style homosexuality can be everywhere though; even among men who consider themselves heterosexual.

  9. I referred to my mother’s Christianese self-help books as Pink Christianity because of their soft, sola femina approach to Christianity and life…

    There’s truth here. Even the better books written by Christian authors toward women (and I have read one or two good ones) tend to be on the soft side on issues that deserve much more directness.

    I always assumed the men in that tale from Judges identified as gay.

    Really? I always assumed just the opposite. Marriage and procreation especially are such a big deal at that time that I had assumed that the vast majority of those men were married but had given themselves over completely to the depravity of the surrounding culture.

    So much so that it was not at all abnormal to prowl around in the middle of the night in search of perversion and pleasure after living a “normal” life all day long.

  10. On the topic of the media selling homosexuality, I saw this article the other week (I think it was linked from Drudge): Science: Straight Athletes Love a Same-Sex Snuggle

    They claim that 93.5% of straight male college athletes in the UK have “spooned” with another man. But it isn’t gay:

    Sometimes you grab his cock, sort of as a joke, particularly if he’s got a semi going. …It just relieves the tension. It’s not like you’re going to wank him.

    Ok. Maybe it is a little gay…

  11. @Dalrock

    I like how they talk about male English public-school athletes (long infamous for their Grecian tendencies), but the picture they show of raw masculine athletes being affectionate is an American football player clasping another player on the back on the sidelines; as if it were a precursor to a forthcoming non-wanking cock-grab in the locker-room.

  12. Pingback: Prayer and Sodomy in the News | Things that We have Heard and Known

  13. That study perfectly encapsulates why I don’t accept most sociological research as being valid at all. First of all, it was only 40 students. Second of all, it was really just fact-free pro-homo proselytizing. Consider the theoretical underpinning:

    The sociologists deliberately focused on athletes to gauge the changing beliefs of a group traditionally thought to harbor negative opinions about same-sex contact. Conducting qualitative interviews with a small sample size of 40, Anderson says their responses were consistent with his earlier research. A total of 39 out of 40 said they have shared beds, usually after a night out, and 37 said they often fall asleep spooning. The reason for this, researchers believe, is that homophobia is on the decline, and intimate contact is no longer seen as a breach of masculinity

    Oddly, I’ve heard men say the opposite, that because homosexuality is so open now they are more likely not to touch their male friends because they don’t want people to think they are gay, whereas previously that idea wouldn’t have crossed people’s minds.

    High school and college girls are often physically affectionate with their female friends. We used to scratch each other’s backs, play with each other’s hair, paint each other’s toenails…and I think girls still do this. Since the feminine is extolled so highly in society at large, it isn’t
    surprising that young men might emulate some of this girl-girl cuddling. But then this:

    Sometimes you grab his cock, sort of as a joke, particularly if he’s got a semi going. …It just relieves the tension. It’s not like you’re going to wank him.

    In all my cuddly interactions as a young woman with my female friends, never once did any of us grab each other’s genitals. That would have been completely unacceptable and clearly seen as a sexual come-on.

    If you are grabbing the genitals of another person of the same sex in order to relieve tension, you are engaging in homoerotic behavior, plain and simple. It’s not normal buddy behavior, and because the “researchers” portray it as such, we can know that these “researchers” came into this “study” with an agenda to promote homosexual behavior.

    By the way, did anyone else read this? If not, I highly recommend reading the entire article all the way through:

    LEGISLATIVE BULLYING
    http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/05/legislative-bullying

  14. Pink Christianity because of their soft, sola femina approach to Christianity and life

    Sola femina pink Christianity! Perfect description for modern Churchianity. I’m probably going to use this.

  15. @Cane

    “Like the other times I’ve read it, I am dumbfounded that all the men were gay.”

    Ever been to Afghanistan?

  16. @Oscar

    No sir, but that’s a good point. I had heard that from Christopher Hitchens, but never considered it in the proper context.

    Several people have told me a similar thing about Brazil. They report sodomy is just a way to pass time among Brazilian youth.

  17. Brazilian youth in general, despite variance among different regions, don’t practice sodomy. It’s more of a “prison rape” thing, similar to what happens among dark-skinned minorities in prison in the USA. It’s also quite interrelated to gang violence and out-of-control ghetto behavior.

    Of course since there has been a massive rise on brainwashing among major Brazilian TV Channels such as Globo about how the LGBTQPPI are supposedly holy and precious (both in their soap operas, as well as their news articles), this practice might start to spread in more decadent regions.

  18. Well, the TV brainwashing might change some cultural norms if it’s successful, and I hope it isn’t.

  19. @Cane

    “that’s a good point. I had heard that from Christopher Hitchens, but never considered it in the proper context.”

    It’s all over the Middle East, but Afghans are worse about it (I think) than Arabs. From my observation, some of it has to do with prison rape (imposing ones will on another man by violating him in the most humiliating way possible), some of it is kind of like the Greek practice of keeping catamites, but most of it, I think, stems from their contempt for women.

    The Army conducted a study among the Pashtun population (it’s the same among the other tribes) that confirmed my observations. You can read the study here:

    http://publicintelligence.net/afghanistan-human-terrain-team-pashtun-homosexuality-report/

    This Fox News article provides a pretty good summary.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/28/afghan-men-struggle-sexual-identity-study-finds/

    Check out this quote:

    ” The U.S. army medic also told members of the research unit that she and her colleagues had to explain to a local man how to get his wife pregnant.

    The report said: “When it was explained to him what was necessary, he reacted with disgust and asked, ‘How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean, when one could be with a man, who is clean? Surely this must be wrong.'” ”

    Impeccable logic.

    One thing is for sure. They don’t consider themselves homosexual. Weirdos.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s